Diffusing Hate: How To Make Hope Work In Political TV/Video Ads (2024)

Our latest analysis presents a fascinating insight into the emotional tone of messaging in television commercials and video content. Leveraging our proprietary AI technology, we’ve analyzed over 10 million television commercials & video assets to bring you some groundbreaking findings.

The Sobering Efficacy of Negative Messaging in TV/video

Our data analysis reveals an unfortunate truth: on average, TV & video advertising that makes use of negative messaging, particularly hate messaging, outperforms positive or hopeful messages in terms of viewer engagement and downstream response. This finding emerged from a rigorous examination of over 10 Million TV commercials and videos, spanning various industries and demographics.

While it’s a known tactic for politicians to use negative messaging, the extent of its effectiveness revealed in Videoquant’s analysis was startling. Videoquant previously uncovered that most large US brands skew their TV commercials to be highly positive, as shown in this results from a prior Videoquant analysis.

However, contrary to the more commonly used positive approaches by large brands in their TV commercials and video advertising, the data revealed a clear preference for negative messaging in driving engagement and ROI. Hate messaging consistently outperformed hope messaging, achieving a ‘B’ grade compared to the latter’s ‘D’ grade in terms of downstream responsiveness.

Navigating the Dynamics of Hate vs. Hope

The findings by Videoquant are particularly intriguing in the political context. The analysis showed a stark contrast between the effectiveness of hope and hate messaging:

  • Hope Messaging: It consistently underperformed, averaging a score of 0.37 with a confidence band of 0.33 to 0.41. This was a clear indication that, in the realm of politics, hope wasn’t compelling in driving results.
  • Hate Messaging: In stark contrast, hate messaging showed significantly better results, scoring an average of 0.46, with a confidence band of 0.42 to 0.50. This reinforced the notion that negative emotions could be more powerful in influencing audience responses.

The Complexity of Emotional Messaging in Political Campaigns

The implications of these findings are profound, particularly as we approach the 2024 elections. Videoquant’s research suggests that political campaigns, often defaulting to negative messaging due to its perceived effectiveness, might be missing out on the nuanced potential of positive messaging when used strategically.

Challenging the Status Quo: Is There Room for Hope?

Despite the apparent dominance of negative messaging, D’Auria and his team at Videoquant were not content to accept this as an unchangeable reality. They embarked on an exploratory journey to see if hope messaging could be optimized to match, or even surpass, the effectiveness of negative tones. This led to experimenting with different framing and contexts for hopeful messages for political TV commercials and video ads, searching for a formula that could break through the hate noise, resonate more deeply with audiences, and drive results.

Finding the Right Balance

The key, as Videoquant’s analysis uncovered, lies in a nuanced balance between hope and realism. Messages that begin with a negative or challenging context but pivot to hope and resolution seem to have a higher potential for impact. This subtle approach to crafting hopeful messages is one key to achieving the elusive blend of emotional engagement and positive messaging.

In their study, a hopeful message framed within a context of despair (“I thought all hope was lost until…”) significantly outperformed traditional hopeful messaging, scoring a 0.58 in the political realm, with a confidence band of 0.54 to 0.62, and surpassing the effectiveness of hate messaging. This suggests that the framing and context of hope are crucial in enhancing its appeal and efficacy.

Looking Ahead with Cautious Optimism

As the political landscape gears up for the next big electoral showdown, the insights from Videoquant offer both a warning and a beacon of hope. The prevalence of negative messaging is likely to continue, given its proven effectiveness. However, there is an opportunity for innovative campaigns to harness the power of positive messaging, strategically framed to challenge the status quo.

Conclusion: The Ethical Dimension and Beyond

The findings from Videoquant not only illuminate the practical aspects of political advertising but also invite a broader discussion about the ethical implications of emotional manipulation in media. As we move forward, the challenge for advertisers, campaigners, and strategists lies in balancing effectiveness with responsibility, crafting messages that not only persuade but also uplift and unite.

Founder flashback: Link to embarrassing video of founder in 2012 discussing political text mining for one of his earlier companies that was acquired.

Tim D’Auria, the founder of Videoquant, continues to lead the way in uncovering the intricacies of video content effectiveness, guiding the industry towards a more nuanced and performant approach to TV/video creative strategy.

Most TV & video ads have anemic results; ~80% is caused by non-ideal creative strategy. VQ is a patent-pending system to avoid ineffective video concepts using outcomes data from 10M+ TV ads and online videos.


News & Press




55 Court St, FL 2
Boston, MA 02108